Sacred Texts

Mandukya Upanishad: Twelve Mantras

The Mandukya Upanishad is twelve mantras long — the shortest of the ten — and the Muktika Upanishad says that for a seeker of liberation the Mandukya alone is enough. What it does in twelve mantras is take the single syllable Om, split it into its three sounds plus the silence after, and map those onto the four states a person passes through every day: waking, dreaming, dreamless sleep, and the fourth. It also contains the Mahavakya of the Atharva Veda.

🕉️ Mandukya at a Glance

Veda: Atharva · Extent: 12 mantras — the shortest
Mahavakya: ayam ātmā brahma — this Self is Brahman (mantra 2)
Four states: Vaishvanara · Taijasa · Prajna · Turiya
Four parts of Om: A · U · M · the silence (amatra)
Commentary: Gaudapada's Karika, in four prakaranas
The Muktika says: this one alone suffices for liberation

🕉️ Everything Is Om

The first mantra makes a claim about a syllable that would be extravagant if the rest of the text did not go on to justify it:

oṁ ity etad akṣharam idaṁ sarvam — Om: this syllable is all this. Its explanation is this: all that is past, present and future is Om — and whatever else is beyond the three times, that too is Om.

Mandukya Upanishad, mantra 1

The second mantra then states the Mahavakya and sets up the entire structure of the text:

सर्वं ह्येतद् ब्रह्म अयमात्मा ब्रह्म सोऽयमात्मा चतुष्पात् ॥

sarvaṁ hy etad brahma ayam ātmā brahma so'yam ātmā chatuṣh-pāt — all this is Brahman. This Self is Brahman. This same Self has four quarters.

Mandukya Upanishad, mantra 2 — the Mahavakya of the Atharva Veda

📌 Why the method is unusual

Most Upanishads argue toward Brahman through cosmology or through a teacher's dialogue. The Mandukya starts from something every reader already has direct access to — the states of their own consciousness — and works outward. Its evidence is that you sleep every night.

🌞 The Four States

QuarterStateDescription in the textMatra
VaishvanaraWaking
jagarita-sthana
Outward-knowing; seven limbs and nineteen mouths; enjoys the gross A
TaijasaDream
svapna-sthana
Inward-knowing; seven limbs and nineteen mouths; enjoys the subtle U
PrajnaDeep sleep
sushupta
Desires no desire and sees no dream; a mass of consciousness, blissful, enjoying bliss; the lord and knower of all, the source into which beings enter and from which they emerge M
TuriyaThe fourth
chaturtha
See below the silence

The seventh mantra, describing the fourth, is one of the most quoted passages in Vedanta — and it is composed almost entirely of denials:

Not inward-knowing, not outward-knowing, not both; not a mass of consciousness; not knowing, not unknowing. Unseen, beyond dealings, ungraspable, without distinguishing mark, unthinkable, unnameable — the essence of the knowledge of the one Self, that into which the world is resolved, peaceful, benign (shivam), non-dual. That is the fourth, and that is to be known.

Mandukya Upanishad, mantra 7

💡 Why turiya is simply called “the fourth”

Because it is not a state alongside the other three. It has no positive description available — every attempt in mantra 7 is a negation — so it is named only by its position in the count. The tradition reads it as what is present in all three rather than as a further experience to be added: the awareness that is there in waking, in dream and in dreamless sleep alike.

🔊 The Syllable Taken Apart

Mantras 8 to 12 correlate the four quarters with the sounds of Om, and the derivations are given as etymological plays:

  • A — Vaishvanara. From apti, obtaining, and adimattva, being first. One who knows this obtains all desires and becomes first.
  • U — Taijasa. From utkarsha, exaltation, and ubhayatva, being both — since U stands between A and M as dream stands between waking and sleep.
  • M — Prajna. From miti, measure, and apiti, merging — since in it all is measured and into it all merges.
  • The fourth is amatra — without a measure, soundless. Beyond dealings, the cessation of the manifold, benign, non-dual. One who knows this enters the Self by the Self.

📌 Where the fourth actually is

Not a fourth sound, but the silence after the syllable ends. The three sounds are the three states; what remains when they stop, and which was there while they sounded, is turiya. It is the neatest thing in the Upanishads — the whole doctrine carried by how a syllable is pronounced.

📚 Gaudapada's Karika

The Mandukya is almost never read alone. Attached to it is the Mandukya Karika — also called the Gaudapadiya Karika or Agama Shastra — by Gaudapada, traditionally the teacher of Shankara's teacher Govindapada.

PrakaranaSubject
AgamaCommentary on the twelve mantras themselves
VaitathyaUnreality — the argument that the waking world has the same status as the dream world
AdvaitaNon-duality established directly, by reasoning rather than by scripture alone
Alatashanti“The quenching of the firebrand” — the concluding argument

🔥 The alata chakra

Gaudapada's governing image: a firebrand whirled in the dark appears as a circle of fire. The circle is not produced by anything and does not go anywhere when the whirling stops — it never existed as a circle at all. So, he argues, with the appearances of consciousness.

The Karika is not the Upanishad. Gaudapada's work is a commentary and an independent philosophical treatise, and its most radical positions — particularly ajativada, the doctrine of non-origination — are his development rather than statements of the twelve mantras. Many editions print them continuously, which makes the two easy to conflate. When citing, say which.

❓ Frequently Asked Questions

How long is the Mandukya Upanishad?

Twelve mantras — the shortest of the ten. The Muktika Upanishad says that for a seeker of liberation the Mandukya alone is enough. In practice it is almost never read alone, being studied with Gaudapada's Karika, which is considerably longer than the text it comments on.

What are the four states in the Mandukya Upanishad?

Vaishvanara (waking, outward-knowing, the gross); Taijasa (dream, inward-knowing, the subtle); Prajna (deep sleep — no desire desired, no dream seen; a mass of consciousness, blissful); and Turiya, the fourth, described only by negation — unseen, ungraspable, unthinkable, unnameable, peaceful, benign, non-dual.

Why is turiya called simply 'the fourth'?

Because it is not a state alongside the other three and has no positive description available — every attempt in mantra 7 is a negation, so it is named only by its position. The tradition reads it as what is present in all three rather than an experience added to them. In the Om correlation it is not a fourth sound but the silence after the syllable ends.

How do the four states map onto Om?

A = Vaishvanara (from apti, obtaining, and adimattva, being first). U = Taijasa (from utkarsha and ubhayatva, “being both” — U stands between A and M as dream stands between waking and sleep). M = Prajna (from miti, measure, and apiti, merging). The fourth is amatra — soundless, the silence.

What is Gaudapada's Karika?

A commentary and independent treatise by Gaudapada, traditionally the teacher of Shankara's teacher. Four prakaranas: Agama (the mantras), Vaitathya (the waking world has the same status as the dream world), Advaita (non-duality by reasoning), Alatashanti. Its image is the alata chakra — a whirled firebrand appears as a circle that never existed as a circle at all.

Is Gaudapada's philosophy the same as the Mandukya's?

Not identical. Gaudapada's work is both commentary and independent treatise, and its most radical positions — particularly ajativada, non-origination — are his development rather than statements of the twelve mantras. Many editions print the two continuously, which makes them easy to conflate. When citing, say which.

🙏 Conclusion

The Mandukya is twelve mantras and it asks the reader to check its central claim against something they do every night. Waking, dreaming, dreamless sleep — three states, three sounds, and then the silence that was there through all of them and remains when the syllable stops. It never describes the fourth positively because it holds that nothing positive can be said of what does the describing. The Muktika says this one is sufficient on its own, and it is not obvious that it is wrong.

🕊️ Continue the Upanishad Series

Mundaka Upanishad → Taittiriya Upanishad → The 10 Principal Upanishads →

📤 Share This Guide

Share this guide.

Twitter Facebook WhatsApp

📚 More from the Upanishad Series